TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmailRSS
logo

An editorial blog of CFA Society Minnesota

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
    • Compensation Survey Contact Form
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

Monthly Archives: April 2014

Greece is the Word

11th April, 2014 · CFAMNEB

Yesterday Greece was a rock star, returning to public debt markets with a € 3 billion 5 year note priced at a yield of 4.95%. For a country with such a recent history of default, ratings still well below investment grade, which has not seen positive economic growth in over five years, the bond deal was pretty remarkable. As little as nine months ago, yields on Greece’s 10 year restructured bonds were over 11%.  As early as yesterday morning, a car bomb exploded outside the Bank of Greece in Athens, apparently in protest of the expected offering.  And yet investors could not get enough of the new deal, which was reportedly 8x oversubscribed. Yes, Greece was a rock star.

But maybe this is indeed a life of illusion.  A bond that had € 20 billion in demand only yesterday should probably be trading higher, as investors round up their positions. But no, the bond looked like it traded up a little, and then moved steadily lower throughout the day.

Back in the U.S., Investment Grade Credit seemed impervious for most of the past week to the global macro sell-off that’s been going on. Credit spreads have hardly budged – until today, when they finally showed some signs of weakness.  Total returns were positive through yesterday, driven primarily be lower interest rates, leaving the broad credit markets up nearly 1.0% for the week.  With rates down again, total returns should remain positive, but we expect excess returns for the week may dip into negative territory.

Supply was about $21 billion, about the same as last week, and dominated by global and 144a issuers, as U.S. Corporates enter their pre-earnings blackout periods.  Credit Agricole was one of the larger issuers, bringing $3.0 billion across a 5 year fixed, 5 year floater, and a 10 year.  The 10 year priced at +130 (which is tighter than Goldman Sachs current 10 year), and moved a few basis points tighter today in spite of the overall market weakness.  The market is much more comfortable with the safety of the French bank – perhaps in part since it disposed of its Greek subsidiary Emporiki in a transaction completed just a little over a year ago.

Was Emporiki a timely disposition? Or has Greece achieved sufficient reform to get its economy on track? We’ll see how it all pays out, but my guess is that it takes more than a coat of paint to turn an old jalopy into greased lightening.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Posted in Hot Topic Commentary, Weekly Credit Wrap | Tags: greece, Weekly Credit Wrap |

Kubler-Ross and High Frequency Trading

8th April, 2014 · John Boylan, CFA · Leave a comment

Back in high school I once took a class called “Death and Dying”. There I learned the works of Elisabeth Kubler-Ross and her “Five Stages of Grief”. These stages are Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance. I have always thought markets went through some similar stages. The definitions are fairly close between the Investing and the Kubler-Ross versions. Except for #5, Investor Acceptance, defined as “where the strategy is adopted, copied endlessly, and mercilessly beaten into the ground until it breaks by the Street.”

Are we at that stage with high frequency trading strategies now that Michael Lewis’ recent interview on 60 Minutes brought this strategy to the mainstream and government organizations are investigating?

On one side of the coin it likely will take a while, if at all, for investor’s perceptions to change, Washington to hold hearings on the matter, and regulatory bodies to take action. Even then, there is a chance that the status quo won’t change. Many derivative strategies and concepts that were reviewed during the financial crisis a couple of years ago survived because there is a legitimate use of them in the marketplace and that investors may actually benefit as a whole. There are similar arguments for high frequency trading, usually invoking increased market liquidity and tighter spreads. Plus the pace of financial innovation often outstrips the ability of regulators to modify behaviors. Why should high frequency trading be any different?

However, eventually investors do come up with their own successful strategies to counteract something like high frequency trading. Perhaps we might even see a comeback of good old-fashioned block trading. Plus since other countries have taken measures to regulate high frequency trading, there is a precedent. Finally, regulators can move more swiftly and take sweeping actions that vastly impact financial markets more than investors anticipate, such as with Dodd-Frank and reforms such as Sarbanes-Oxley and Reg FD several years earlier in the wake of the internet bubble.

Is high frequency trading at #5 on the investor’s version of the Kubler-Ross scale or are we still at an earlier stage?  What do you think? Has the Michael Lewis interview brought high frequency trading to the fore and that investors will find ways to counteract it and regulators will eventually dismantle the strategy, or are we just at the beginning of a new revolution in algorithmic trading and artificial intelligence?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Posted in Freezing Assets Shout Out, Hot Topic Commentary, Local Charterholders | Tags: freezing assets shout out, high frequency trading, Kubler-Ross |

SEC Examination 2014 Priorities

8th April, 2014 · Jonathan Levy, J.D. · Leave a comment

What Compliance Officers Should Expect from SEC Exams in 2014

If there is one thing that keeps compliance officers up at night, it is that dreaded message from the SEC, “We have decided to conduct an examination of your firm, and please do not treat this as an adversarial proceeding, rather we are here trying to learn about your firm, and we are here to help.” Hardly comforting given the many recent referrals from Enforcement, and the fact that Enforcement lawyers now routinely accompany SEC examiners to on-site inspections.

Recently, the SEC published its 2014 Examination Priorities giving broker-dealers and advisers guidance on areas of concern.

Examination Priorities for Both Brokers and Advisers

System-wide, the SEC will continue to focus on policies around fraud detection and prevention, corporate governance including the control environment and “tone at the top”, conflicts of interest, enterprise risk management, technology and supervision of IT systems.  The SEC will closely examine dual registrants and incentives to firms when customers choose to open accounts at dual registrants as an advisory client or brokerage client. The SEC also will scrutinize how advisers and brokers are addressing new laws and regulations, and sales and marketing practices related to retirement products such as IRAs and 401(k) plans. These broad areas affect nearly every adviser and broker-dealer, and all firms should be prepared for an SEC exam in these areas.

Examination Priorities Specifically for Investment Advisers and Investment Companies

Adviser Core Risks

Still stung by the failure to detect Madoff, for advisers, the SEC will continue to examine custody of client assets and compliance with the custody rules, paying particular attention to advisers that fail to realize that they have custody through non-conventional methods such as check-writing authority or powers of attorney.

Another core risk for advisers is conflicts of interest in business practices such as best execution, soft dollars, and agency/principal transactions. Examiners will scrutinize undisclosed compensation arrangements, allocation of investment opportunities, controls and disclosure when an adviser manages both performance-based accounts and traditional fee accounts, valuation of illiquid securities and higher risk products that are sold to retail and elderly investors. The SEC will review the accuracy of advisers’ performance advertising. Advisers that have wrap-fee programs should expect a review of fiduciary duties and controls to monitor wrap fee conflicts of interest, best execution and trading away from the wrap sponsor. Finally, the SEC will continue to review disclosure and compliance issues related to payments by advisers to distributors, solicitors and other intermediaries.

Areas of Focus for New Advisers Including Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund Managers

New advisers that have not been examined in the last three years, including hedge and private equity fund managers, should expect a visit from the SEC in 2014. The SEC plans to look closely at new advisers’ marketing and sales practices, portfolio management including compensation methodologies, conflicts of interest and safety of client assets, and valuation particularly with respect to hard-to-value illiquid securities and their relationship to portfolio manager compensation.

Increasingly Aggressive Examinations

There is little doubt that the market and regulatory failures of the Great Recession has led to increasingly aggressive and skeptical examinations by the SEC. This creates compliance and reputational risks for firms. The 2014 exam priorities, although quite extensive, nevertheless provide a helpful guide for compliance professionals in determining where to devote finite compliance resources.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Posted in Compliance, Hot Topic Commentary, Local Charterholders | Tags: SEC Examination Priorities |

Optimistic Voices

1st April, 2014 · CFAMNEB

Investment Grade Credit finished the first quarter on a strong note, with spreads moving decidedly tighter during the last 2 weeks of March, generating total returns of nearly 3% for the quarter. With a few hours to go, that’s about 100 basis points better than the Barclay’s Agg, 135 basis points better than Mortgages alone, and 120 basis points ahead of the S&P 500. It’s even a little ahead of High Yield. IG returns were helped by both spread tightening and lower interest rates – definitely not the consensus call to start the year. It almost feels like we’re back in the Greenspan Goldilocks Economy.  Modest economic growth, reduced leverage, good equity returns, rising home prices…the domestic economy is almost like being in a fairy tale right now. Greenspans’s Goldilocks, meet Bernanke’s Dorothy. We’re out of the woods, we’re out of the dark, we’re out of the night….

Of course, the porridge is a lot sweeter this time around. We’ve had zero interest rates for five years now, while Goldilocks was only treated to 1% rates for about 9 months. With tapering firmly on its way and the first rate hikes seemingly just around the corner, will the exit for Dorothy be as smooth? Can we look forward to 3 years of low volatility and stable spreads? Step into the sun, step into the light….

Or will this turn out to be a horse of a different color? Is the whole market so addicted to sugar in its porridge that we go into insulin shock without it?

Maybe that’s a little dramatic. It certainly seems so right now. In addition to solid returns, low volatility and tighter spreads, supply has also been extraordinary, and a pretty good indicator of how eager everyone is to purchase IG Credit. We had the busiest March on record at over $110 billion, and supply for the quarter was up 15% from 2013 – both in a year when supply has been widely anticipated to move down for the full year by as much as 15%.

We’re inclined to stay on the yellow brick road for now. We know how risky it can be to follow a different path. March up to the gate and bid it open…

Open…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Posted in Hot Topic Commentary, Weekly Credit Wrap | Tags: investment grade credit, Weekly Credit Wrap |
Previous Posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Important Minnesota Financial Literacy Legislation Update 03/20/2023
  • New Financial Literacy Effort Launched for Minnesota Communities and Schools 09/30/2022
  • End of an Era 07/26/2022
  • Starting my Midwestern Goodbye 04/05/2022
  • Face-Off 10/18/2021

Submit your inquiry here

Categories

  • Compliance (3)
  • Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule (1)
  • Ethics (7)
    • Ask the Ethicist (2)
  • Freezing Assets Shout Out (34)
  • Hot Topic Commentary (177)
  • Intellisight (1)
  • Local Charterholders (88)
  • Member Spotlight (4)
  • Society President Letters (15)
  • Spotlight on MN Companies (1)
  • Valuation (2)
  • Weekly Credit Wrap (35)

Archives

  • March 2023 (1)
  • September 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (3)
  • March 2018 (8)
  • February 2018 (3)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • November 2017 (5)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (5)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (4)
  • October 2015 (6)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (6)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (7)
  • October 2014 (10)
  • September 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (5)
  • May 2014 (9)
  • April 2014 (9)
  • March 2014 (8)
  • February 2014 (7)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (6)
  • November 2013 (7)
  • October 2013 (13)
  • September 2013 (4)
  • August 2013 (2)

Popular Tags

#memberspotlight 2015 Compensation Survey A Day in the Life BlackRock Board of Directors Carlson School of Management CFA CFA Charter CFA Charterholder CFA Charterholders CFA Institute CFA Institute Research Challenge CFA Minnesota CFAMN CFA Program CFA Society Minnesota CFA Society MN Changing Perceptions Chartered Financial Analyst charterholders Compensation Survey Diversity ESG ethics freezing assets shout out interest rates investment management Josh Howard Joshua M. Howard Member Engagement Minnesota non-GAAP earnings North Dakota Nuveen Asset Management President's Letter SEC Society President South Dakota Susanna Gibbons University of Minnesota Volunteer Volunteering Volunteers Weekly Credit Wrap women in finance
© 2021 CFAMN Freezing Assets - Please note that the content of this site should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFAMN, FreezingAssets.org or CFA Institute.
  • Home
  • Log In
  • RSS Feed